No scientist can resist a puzzle like this one. I must form an hypothesis, and my current hypothesis is the following: the purpose of roots is to collect water and nutrients. So the Alder has a moisture bias. In fact, the eastbound root is heading in the general direction of my well. The root follows, as we techies say, the moisture gradient. Looking for water, in fact. In all my extensive reading I have never found any reference to this phenomenon. The westbound root is relatively short because it found no water in that direction after a while. North and South were dry. No roots survived in those directions. I find this fascinating. The eastbound root is trying to get at my well!
Operationally, then, the stumping procedure is straightforward. With Grappa the grape hoe, unearth the westbound root -- the skinnier one. Cut it. Tie a rope to the fork of the root, start up Achilles the garden tractor, and pull away. Achilles can handle the single, long, eastbound root. Much easier than pulling by hand.
I am now wondering if people who wish to drill a shallow well in the bush should not bother with a "dowser" or "well-witch" as these people are called. I cannot comment on their effectiveness. But just look for the way the alder roots are growing. They point to water. Fascinating thesis for someone. Won't work for deep wells, of course. Not even alder can get down to fifty meters. But for shallow wells it might work. My well, for the record, is about 3 meters.
If you want a deep well, I think you should consult a hydrologist, a geologist, or both, or even a dowser. Deep wells are tricky. The Beyozova school has a deep well at about 30 meters. But perhaps 300 meters to the west, a neighbor had to go down about 65m to hit, presumably, the same aquifer. You pay by the meter of depth. So be warned.
No comments:
Post a Comment